🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to reinitiate atomic negotiations with Washington as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations was effective, and shared new appeals had come from intermediaries to reopen talks with the US government. He claimed Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Walking a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is treading a difficult route since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be proceeding from a stance of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen stronger militarily and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will never give up" – the key factor of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Earlier Negotiations Unexpectedly Concluded

The earlier sessions of discussions between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump claiming the locations had been destroyed. Following this, European countries used their right to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iranian officials said they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could work inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Officials asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the agreement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Status

Tehran representatives said the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in some form if talks restart.

The American leader in recent days claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to restart talks, but confidentially Iranian officials say they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from America either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of inactivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his remarks to the conference, aimed to portray the US as a dominant force that exploits the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict demonstrated the clash could not be resolved by military means. He stated the assaults started with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with complete American awareness and collaboration, making faith difficult to rebuild.

Dialogue Stays the Primary Answer

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was the United States and the western countries that had consistently tried to impose their will during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be viable and remains the final solution to resolve conflicts, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be followed."

"Provided that they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will receive a response in the identical language."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the battle of repair and recovery, Araghchi claimed he was assured Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We acquired numerous insights from this war; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to eliminate, stays intact. The sites and machinery, if eliminated, will be restored; what is essential is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but were unable to shatter. The nation of Iran have developed more powerful, more integrated, and more endorsing of the government and the country in the aftermath of this attack."